<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter was NEVER a Social Networking Site &#8211; proof!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingzen.com/twitter-was-never-a-social-networking-site-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingzen.com/twitter-was-never-a-social-networking-site-proof/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingzen.com/twitter-was-never-a-social-networking-site-proof/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingzen.com/?p=1610#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Hi. One of the best posts read in a while. You nail on the head exactly what Twitter is, ultimately, about (at least in terms of benefit for Twitter). It&#039;s about human search. And this is powerful stuff. I think human search is just in its infancy. But it&#039;s got to be important because how many of us do things in life because of hints/tips/recommendations from friends/family members/work colleauges/people we happen to meet in everyday life - and so on.
I think Twitter has the potential to be equally as important as Google. Perhaps, eventually, overtake it few years down the line perhaps? But it will have to do things, i think, in order to stay ahead of the game. What &quot;things&quot;, exactly? No idea. But people could tired of the Twitter experience unless it develops in new ways.
Facebook? Find more difficult to work out. What do you think about Facebook&#039;s future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. One of the best posts read in a while. You nail on the head exactly what Twitter is, ultimately, about (at least in terms of benefit for Twitter). It&#8217;s about human search. And this is powerful stuff. I think human search is just in its infancy. But it&#8217;s got to be important because how many of us do things in life because of hints/tips/recommendations from friends/family members/work colleauges/people we happen to meet in everyday life &#8211; and so on.<br />
I think Twitter has the potential to be equally as important as Google. Perhaps, eventually, overtake it few years down the line perhaps? But it will have to do things, i think, in order to stay ahead of the game. What &#8220;things&#8221;, exactly? No idea. But people could tired of the Twitter experience unless it develops in new ways.<br />
Facebook? Find more difficult to work out. What do you think about Facebook&#8217;s future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orenthian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingzen.com/twitter-was-never-a-social-networking-site-proof/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Orenthian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingzen.com/?p=1610#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Great post -- and totally agree the next decade will re-invent media itself [even more timely considering the Time Warner / Fox debacle]!

In regards to Twitter NEVER being a social networking website and always being in the human search engine business: Twitter has emerged into a direct competitor of Google, but they weren&#039;t always in the search business... at least from my understanding.

They began as a website with a stronger focus on SMS -- sporting the value proposition: &quot;Twitter is a service for friends, family, and co–workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing?&quot;

Twitter didn&#039;t even have a very robust, native search feature until later 08&#039;. The search feature was more an effort to see my family / friends tweets.

It wasn&#039;t until early / mid 2009 when they officially became more of a discovery engine.

Totally agree with you about &quot;It will be – Twitter vs. Google.&quot;

My opinion is likely more Twitter once was a social networking website, but we are all the better now that it isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8212; and totally agree the next decade will re-invent media itself [even more timely considering the Time Warner / Fox debacle]!</p>
<p>In regards to Twitter NEVER being a social networking website and always being in the human search engine business: Twitter has emerged into a direct competitor of Google, but they weren&#8217;t always in the search business&#8230; at least from my understanding.</p>
<p>They began as a website with a stronger focus on SMS &#8212; sporting the value proposition: &#8220;Twitter is a service for friends, family, and co–workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Twitter didn&#8217;t even have a very robust, native search feature until later 08&#8242;. The search feature was more an effort to see my family / friends tweets.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t until early / mid 2009 when they officially became more of a discovery engine.</p>
<p>Totally agree with you about &#8220;It will be – Twitter vs. Google.&#8221;</p>
<p>My opinion is likely more Twitter once was a social networking website, but we are all the better now that it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

